paradigmes, La Femme

                            P A R A D I G M S

Thomas Kuhm in The Structure of  Scientific Revolution  defines paradigm  :

    "I consider these [paradigms] to be universally accepted scientific achievements that for some time provided models of problems and solutions to a community of professionals" (pp. 14-15)

To step out of the box is something always daring to do. Paradigms are set for a reason; to sustain our reality and give us stable ground to walk towards progress, Paradigms are an agreement an action that gre into a cotidianity, a normal ciencie until the is an anomaly, an unexpected  phenomen, then scientists try to integrate them into the traditional explanatory model, when there is an exception, then the anomaly is followed by a crisis, which we define as a period of confusion that will lead to a period of reestructure until another paradigm is constructed. We only know they are paradigms when they are broken meanwhile we hold them as thruths.

Me myself fights to change the concept of "universal values" or the "universal human rights" as I consider it is about time. 

We terricoles have no jurisdiction over the Universe, we don't even know it all. It is inmense, so how  did we manage to stablish something so extended such as "universal" human rights? 

Back in the ancient  Greece when we first observed the space and planets we got the hint that we were not alone, Nowadays we don't know if our existing compagnions are humans but  for sure there is more else, another creation, or perhaps they are in fact exacty like us but they have stablished other rights they believe to be the valuables ones. 

I am eagered for this terminology to be reestrured to something less intrusive that doesn't overpose us human beings over other creations. Changing the teminology will allow us to be conscient of our small presence in comparison of an inmense existence.

The spyral structure

It is very interesting to see it this way, we are unconsciously incompetent in a ton of things which kinda  reminds me to the descartian "daría todo lo que sé por la mitad de lo que ignoro". Once you found yourself acknolowdging there are tons of things you're not aware of and that you suck at you wonder what's beyond that veil of ignorance or if it's lack of practice, it often happens to  me that I seek to know more until I am not completely lost and if I am interested enough I will go on until I get lazy or think I've mastered it. Then found myself again knowing nothing at all or my favorite way; I get questioned (and hard) so I discover there are other or  more effective ways to do it,      

It also happens that I am not the best in math, I've gotten better because of my job, I've always been aware that I was incompent but now I'm proudly conciously competent and  I hope to one day achive the unconciously competent square that awaits me right in the corner. There are other areas where I am not even aware I suck at and in those I can't even name I stay still, no movement, no progress. That is the case of many others, probably due to the fact they're are not aware they also have the faculties needed to develop the skill,  I think that is leaned to the self-concept. It  seems to me very positivist to say that we all can achieve the same  level of master in something,  itmakes sense but that I at least barely hear, But it could also be because it is not essential in our daily basis,

It's a really interesting theory.

Bibliography:

D´Alessandro Martínez, A., Michinel, J. L., & Malaver de la Fuente, M. (2015). Los paradigmas en la Física, retardos difusionales e implicaciones didácticas. Revista de investigación educacional, 39(86), 191–219. http://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1010-29142015000300010